Compare Volvo S90 facelift vs Volvo S40 vs Volvo S60

Volvo S90 facelift

Volvo S40

Volvo S60

Volvo S90 faceliftVolvo S40Volvo S60
Variants
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
1.6 105hp MT
1.6 105hp AT
1.6 109hp MT
1.8 115hp MT
1.8 115hp AT
1.8 122hp MT
1.8 GDI MT
1.9D 115hp MT
1.9D 102hp MT
1.9T MT
1.9T AT
1.9D 90hp MT
2.0 136hp MT
2.0 140hp MT
2.0 140hp AT
2.0T 160hp MT
2.0T 160hp AT
2.0T 165hp MT
2.0T
2.0T AT
2.3 T5
2.3 T5 AT
2.4 140hp
2.4 140hp AT
2.4 170hp
2.4 170hp AT
2.4 D5 163hp
2.4 D5 185hp
2.4 T5 260hp
2.4 T5 260hp AT
2.4D
2.4D AT
2.4T 200hp
2.4T 200hp AT
2.4T 200hp AWD
2.5T 210hp
2.5T 210hp AWD
R AWD
R AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score64%17%33%
Pros
  • Overall good styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Solid safety rating
  • Interesting set of I5 engines
  • Good reliability
Cons
  • Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Questionable design
  • Not the best years of Volvo under Ford
  • Uninspiring drive
  • Sterile design inside and outside

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.