Compare Volvo S60 III vs Volvo S40 II facelift vs Volvo S60 Cross Country

Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 Twin Engine AWD
T8 Twin Engine AWD
Polestar
1.6 100hp
1.6 101hp
1.6 D2
1.6 DRIVe
2.0 D3
2.0 D3 AT
2.0 D4
2.0 D4 AT
2.0 Euro4
2.0 Euro5
2.0 FLEXIFUEL
2.5T 230hp
2.5T AT
2.5T AWD
D3
D3 AT
D4
D4 AT
D4 AWD AT
T5 AWD AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
380 L / 13.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.9 L / 9.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
67.5 L / 17.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
554 kg / 1221 lbs
474 kg / 1045 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Independent, spring multi-link with stabilizer

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
142 mm / 5.6 in
201 mm / 7.9 in
Size | Height
1431 mm / 56.3 in
1539 mm / 60.6 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1770 mm / 69.7 in
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1619.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1577.0 mm / 62.1 in
Weight
1656.0 kg / 3650.9 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2774 mm / 109.2 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
37.0 m / 121.4 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
0.28
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Redline
5000 rpm
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2015 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
61%
36%
40%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Good interior quality
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Quite reliable
  • Available with the famous Volvo T5
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Lack smoothness
  • Unreliable engines
  • Too many electronic gimmicks
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Rather questionable exterior design
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.