Compare Volvo S60 III vs Volvo S40 II facelift vs Volvo S40 II

Volvo S60 III

Volvo S40 II facelift

Volvo S40 II

Volvo S60 IIIVolvo S40 II faceliftVolvo S40 II
Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 Twin Engine AWD
T8 Twin Engine AWD
Polestar
1.6 100hp
1.6 101hp
1.6 D2
1.6 DRIVe
2.0 D3
2.0 D3 AT
2.0 D4
2.0 D4 AT
2.0 Euro4
2.0 Euro5
2.0 FLEXIFUEL
2.5T 230hp
2.5T AT
2.5T AWD
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.0 TDI
2.4 140hp
2.4 140hp AT
2.4 170hp
2.4 170hp AT
2.5T AWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score61%36%33%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Good interior quality
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Quite reliable
  • Available with the famous Volvo T5
  • Interesting Inline-5 engines, including the T5
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Lack smoothness
  • Unreliable engines
  • Too many electronic gimmicks
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Questionable exterior design
  • Simple interiors

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.