HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Volvo S60 III vs Volvo S40 II vs Volvo S80

Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 Twin Engine AWD
T8 Twin Engine AWD
Polestar
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.0 TDI
2.4 140hp
2.4 140hp AT
2.4 170hp
2.4 170hp AT
2.5T AWD
2.0T 163hp
2.0T 163hp AT
2.0T 180hp
2.0T 180hp AT
2.0T 226hp
2.0T 226hp AT
2.4 140hp
2.4 140hp AT
2.4 170hp
2.4 170hp AT
2.4D 130hp
2.4D 163hp
2.4D 163hp AT
2.4T 200hp
2.5D 140hp
2.8T 272hp
2.9 196hp
2.9 200hp
2.9 204hp
2.9 204hp AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
404 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 883 L / 31.2 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
554 kg / 1221 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Transverse stabilizer
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Transverse stabilizer
Helical spring

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
142 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1431 mm / 56.3 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1770 mm / 69.7 in
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
61%
33%
21%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Good interior quality
  • Interesting Inline-5 engines, including the T5
  • Compact I6 engine for FWD
  • Sweet I5 engine options
  • Classy exterior design
  • Great safety record
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Lack smoothness
  • Unreliable engines
  • Too many electronic gimmicks
  • No powerful engine options
  • Questionable exterior design
  • Simple interiors
  • Nothing exciting

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.