Compare Volvo S60 III vs Volvo S40 vs Volvo S60 Cross Country
Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 Twin Engine AWD
T8 Twin Engine AWD
Polestar
1.6 105hp MT
1.6 105hp AT
1.6 109hp MT
1.8 115hp MT
1.8 115hp AT
1.8 122hp MT
1.8 GDI MT
1.9D 115hp MT
1.9D 102hp MT
1.9T MT
1.9T AT
1.9D 90hp MT
2.0 136hp MT
2.0 140hp MT
2.0 140hp AT
2.0T 160hp MT
2.0T 160hp AT
2.0T 165hp MT
D3
D3 AT
D4
D4 AT
D4 AWD AT
T5 AWD AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
380 L / 13.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.9 L / 9.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
67.5 L / 17.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
554 kg / 1221 lbs
474 kg / 1045 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Wishbone
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Helical spring
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
142 mm / 5.6 in
201 mm / 7.9 in
Size | Height
1431 mm / 56.3 in
1539 mm / 60.6 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1619.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1577.0 mm / 62.1 in
Weight
1656.0 kg / 3650.9 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in
15 in
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2774 mm / 109.2 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
37.0 m / 121.4 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
0.28
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Redline
5000 rpm
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
61%
17%
40%
Pros
- Decent styling
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Good interior quality
- Solid safety rating
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Lack smoothness
- Unreliable engines
- Too many electronic gimmicks
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Questionable design
- Not the best years of Volvo under Ford
- Rather questionable exterior design
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.