Compare Jaguar XF X260 vs Porsche Panamera 970 vs Jaguar XJ X351
Variants
20d
20d AWD
20d Euro6d
20d Euro6d AWD
20d Euro6d MT
20d MHEV
20d MHEV AWD
20d MT
20t
25d
25d AWD
25d Euro6d AWD
25t
25t AWD
25t Euro6d
25t Euro6d AWD
25t Euro6d TEMP
30d
30d AWD
30t AWD
30t AWD
30t Euro6d AWD
35t
35t AWD
E-Performance
E-Performance Euro6d
E-Performance Euro6d MT
E-Performance MT
XF S
XF S AWD
Panamera
Panamera 4 PDK
Panamera 4S PDK
Panamera Diesel AT
Panamera PDK
Panamera S
Panamera S Hybrid
Panamera S PDK
Panamera Turbo PDK
XJ 2.0
XJ 3.0 AWD
XJ 3.0 D
XJ 3.0 D 6AT
XJ 3.0 D 8AT
XJ 3.0 Supercharged
XJ 5.0 6AT
XJ 5.0 Supercharged 470PS
XJ 5.0 Supercharged 510PS 6AT
XJ 5.0 Supercharged 510PS 8AT
XJL 2.0
XJL 3.0 AWD
XJL 3.0 D
XJL 3.0 D
XJL 3.0 Supercharged
XJL 5.0 6AT
XJL 5.0 Supercharged 470PS
XJL 5.0 Supercharged 510PS 8AT
XJR
XJR 575
XJR-L
XJR-L 575
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft
Passengers
5
4
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.7 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Nickel-metal hydride
Battery | Voltage
288.0 V
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
116 mm / 4.6 in
143 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1418 mm / 55.8 in
Size | Length
4970 mm / 195.7 in
Size | Width
1899 mm / 74.8 in | 2105 mm / 82.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1626.0 mm / 64.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1604.0 mm / 63.1 in
Wheel Size
8.0J x 18, 9.0J x 19, 9.0J x 20
Wheelbase
2960 mm / 116.5 in
2920 mm / 115.0 in
Performance
Electric Range
2.0 km / 1.2 mi
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 6
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
71%
86%
82%
Pros
- Good supercharged V6
- Good 0.25 drag coefficient
- Good interior quality
- Exceptional power and performance for a full-size sedan
- NA V8 + manual + RWD!!!
- Great double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Designed for the driver inside
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Powerful engine lineup
- Great double-wishbone suspension setup
- High build quality
Cons
- Poor reliability
- Bland styling
- Diesel and hybrid nonsense
- AWD only with Turbo and Turbo S
- Some questionable design choices
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.