Compare Maserati Quattroporte 6 vs Tesla Model S facelift 2 vs Tesla Model S facelift
Variants
Quattroporte
Quattroporte 2016
Quattroporte Diesel
Quattroporte GTS
Quattroporte S
Quattroporte S 2017
Quattroporte S Q4
Quattroporte S Q4 2017
Quattroporte Trofeo
Long Range
Plaid
100D
60
60D
70
70D
75
75D
90D
Long Range
P100D
P90D
P90D AWD
Performance
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
793 L / 28.0 cu-ft
745 L / 26.3 cu-ft ~ 1645 L / 58.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
14.2 L / 15.0 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
8.3 L / 8.8 qt
Passengers
5
5
Payload
426 kg / 939 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double wishb
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
100 kWh
Body Style
4-door Sedan
5-door battery-electric Sedan
5-door battery-electric Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
160 mm / 6.3 in
Size | Height
1481 mm / 58.3 in
1445 mm / 56.9 in
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
5262 mm / 207.2 in
4970 mm / 195.7 in
4980 mm
Size | Width
1964 mm / 77.3 in | 2189 mm / 86.2 in (mirror unfolded)
1964 mm
Track Width | Front
1634.0 mm / 64.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1647.0 mm / 64.8 in
Weight
1961 - 2250 kg
Wheel Size
19 in, 21 in
19"; 21" (optional)
Wheelbase
3171 mm / 124.8 in
2960 mm / 116.5 in
2960 mm
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.208
0.24
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
All-wheel drive
Dual motor AWD
Engine
F154 AM
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
1-speed
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2021
Debut
2012-06-22
Made In
US: California; EU: Netherlands
Reviews
Neofiliac score
82%
85%
74%
Pros
- Good handling
- Improved performance
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Improved interior quality
- Mind-blowing performance
- Excellent 0.20 drag coefficient
- Decent styling
- Good handling
- Down to exceptional 2.5s 0-100kph time
- Up to 598hp of power
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
Cons
- Uglier than before
- No more NA engine
- Build quality problems
- Filled with gimmicks
- Lots of reliability issues
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.