Compare Canon EOS R10 Mirrorless vs Nikon Z50 Mirrorless vs Canon EOS M200 Mirrorless

Canon EOS R10 Mirrorless

Nikon Z50 Mirrorless

Canon EOS M200 Mirrorless

Canon EOS R10 MirrorlessNikon Z50 MirrorlessCanon EOS M200 Mirrorless

Reviews

Neofiliac score53%57%49%
Pros
  • Fully articulated LCD
  • High 15.0 fps burst rate
  • Rather compact
  • Quite light
  • Good 11.0 fps burst rate
  • Rather compact
  • Quite light
  • Weather-sealed
  • Viewfinder with great 1.02x magnification
  • Supports both WiFi and Bluetooth
  • Exceptionally compact
  • Very light
  • Supports both WiFi and Bluetooth
  • Simple, minimalist design
Cons
  • Lacks weather sealing
  • Low resolution EVF
  • Quite big for what it is (thanks to the large mount)
  • Poor battery life
  • Low resolution EVF
  • Poor battery life
  • Low 6.1 fps burst rate
  • Lacks weather sealing

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.