Compare Audi R8 (4S) Spyder vs Audi R8 (42) Spyder vs Volvo C70 Convertible
Variants
V10
V10 Plus
4.2 FSI 6DCT
4.2 FSI 7DCT
4.2 FSI MT
5.2 FSI 2012+ MT
5.2 FSI 6DCT
5.2 FSI 7DCT
5.2 FSI MT
GT
2.0T 180
2.0T 225
2.0T 225 AT
2.0T 163
T5 239
T5 245
2.4T 200
2.5
2.5 AT
2.5T
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
100 L / 3.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
24.7 L / 26.1 qt
25.0 L / 26.4 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.0 L / 7.4 qt
5.8 L / 6.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
Passengers
2
2
4
Payload
300 kg / 661 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
245/35 R19, 295/35 R19
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
110 mm / 4.3 in
Size | Height
1244 mm / 49.0 in
1244 mm / 49.0 in
Size | Length
4426 mm / 174.3 in
Track Width | Front
1638.0 mm / 64.5 in
1638.0 mm / 64.5 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2660 mm / 104.7 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
12.5:1
Engine | Displacement
5.2 L / 317.6 cu-in / 5204.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V10 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
90%
87%
28%
Pros
- Superb performance
- Smooth, linear power
- Characterful V10
- Still looks good
- Characterful V10 engine
- Glorious 8700rpm redline
- Great handling characteristics
- Manual transmission
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Gorgeous with top down
- Characterful I5 engines
- No diesel nonsense
- Reliable drivetrain
Cons
- High 0.36 drag coefficient
- Ugly with the top up and down
- Low cargo capacity
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.