Compare Audi R8 (42) Spyder vs Audi TT RS 8J Roadster vs Audi A3 (8P7) Cabriolet
Variants
4.2 FSI 6DCT
4.2 FSI 7DCT
4.2 FSI MT
5.2 FSI 2012+ MT
5.2 FSI 6DCT
5.2 FSI 7DCT
5.2 FSI MT
GT
2.5 TFSI (340 Hp)
TT RS DCT
TT RS MT
TT RS plus DCT
TT RS plus MT
1.2 TFSI
1.4 TFSI
1.6
1.6 TDI
1.8 TFSI
1.8 TFSI DCT
1.9 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI DCT
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI DCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
100 L / 3.5 cu-ft
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft
260 L / 9.2 cu-ft ~ 674 L / 23.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
25.0 L / 26.4 qt
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
2
2
4
Payload
300 kg / 661 lbs
320 kg / 705 lbs
500 kg / 1102 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Tire Size
245/40 R18
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
110 mm / 4.3 in
Size | Height
1244 mm / 49.0 in
1348 mm / 53.1 in
1424 mm / 56.1 in
Size | Length
4198 mm / 165.3 in
4238 mm / 166.9 in
Size | Width
1842 mm / 72.5 in | 1952 mm / 76.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1638.0 mm / 64.5 in
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
1534.0 mm / 60.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
1507.0 mm / 59.3 in
Wheel Size
9J x 18
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2468 mm / 97.2 in
2578 mm / 101.5 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.3 cu-in / 2480.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-5 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Reviews
Neofiliac score
87%
74%
33%
Pros
- Characterful V10 engine
- Glorious 8700rpm redline
- Great handling characteristics
- Manual transmission
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Gorgeous with top down
- Decent performance
- Interesting 2.5 TFSI engine
- Decent reliability
- Cheap used
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Very ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Unreliable DCT
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.