HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Audi TT RS 8J Roadster vs Audi A5 B9 Cabriolet vs Audi A4 B7 Cabriolet

Variants
2.5 TFSI (340 Hp)
TT RS DCT
TT RS MT
TT RS plus DCT
TT RS plus MT
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DCT
2.0 TDI 190 DCT
2.0 TDI 190 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 190
2.0 TFSI 252 DCT
2.0 TFSI 252 quattro DCT
3.0 TDI 218 DCT
3.0 TDI 218 quattro DCT
3.0 TDI 286 quattro AT
35 TDI DCT
40 TDI DCT
40 TDI quattro DCT
40 TFSI
40 TFSI DCT
45 TFSI DCT
45 TFSI quattro DCT
50 TDI quattro AT
1.8T
1.8T CVT
1.8T quattro
2.0
2.0 TDI
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI CVT
2.5 TDI
2.5 TDI CVT
2.7 TDI CVT
3.0 TDI quattro
3.0 TDI quattro AT
3.2 FSI
3.2 FSI quattro
3.2 FSI quattro AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft
246 L / 8.7 cu-ft ~ 315 L / 11.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Payload
320 kg / 705 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/40 R18
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1348 mm / 53.1 in
1383 mm / 54.4 in
1391 mm / 54.8 in
Size | Length
4198 mm / 165.3 in
4673 mm / 184.0 in
4573 mm / 180.0 in
Size | Width
1842 mm / 72.5 in | 1952 mm / 76.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1777 mm / 70.0 in
Track Width | Front
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
1568.0 mm / 61.7 in
Wheel Size
9J x 18
7J x 16
Wheelbase
2468 mm / 97.2 in
2765 mm / 108.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.3 cu-in / 2480.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-5 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Reviews

Neofiliac score
74%
72%
61%
Pros
  • Decent performance
  • Interesting 2.5 TFSI engine
  • Decent reliability
  • Improved drivetrain reliability
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Multi-link suspensions all around
  • Improved engine output
  • Better ZF 6HP auto transmission
  • Improved electronics
  • Multi-link suspensions all around
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Over-styled
  • Euro6d-related problems
  • Awkward styling
  • Horrible CVT problems
  • AWD nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.