HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Audi TT RS 8J Roadster vs Audi A3 (8P7) Cabriolet vs Peugeot 308 CC

Variants
2.5 TFSI (340 Hp)
TT RS DCT
TT RS MT
TT RS plus DCT
TT RS plus MT
1.2 TFSI
1.4 TFSI
1.6
1.6 TDI
1.8 TFSI
1.8 TFSI DCT
1.9 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI DCT
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI DCT
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 HDI 110
1.6 HDI 115
1.6 THP 140 AT
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 155
1.6 THP 155 AT
1.6 THP 200
2.0 HDi 140
2.0 HDi 160
2.0 HDI 165
2.0 HDI 165 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft
260 L / 9.2 cu-ft ~ 674 L / 23.8 cu-ft
226 L / 8.0 cu-ft ~ 403 L / 14.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Payload
320 kg / 705 lbs
500 kg / 1102 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
245/40 R18
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1348 mm / 53.1 in
1424 mm / 56.1 in
Size | Length
4198 mm / 165.3 in
4238 mm / 166.9 in
Size | Width
1842 mm / 72.5 in | 1952 mm / 76.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
1534.0 mm / 60.4 in
1526.0 mm / 60.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
1507.0 mm / 59.3 in
1521.0 mm / 59.9 in
Wheel Size
9J x 18
Wheelbase
2468 mm / 97.2 in
2578 mm / 101.5 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.3 cu-in / 2480.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-5 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Reviews

Neofiliac score
74%
33%
24%
Pros
  • Decent performance
  • Interesting 2.5 TFSI engine
  • Decent reliability
  • Cheap used
  • Improved styling
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Very ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Unreliable DCT
  • Awkward proportions
  • Slow and sluggish
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poor interior finish

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.