Compare Porsche Boxster 987.1 vs Audi TT RS 8J Roadster vs Audi A4 B6 Cabriolet
Variants
Boxster 240
Boxster 240 AT
Boxster S 3.2
Boxster S 3.2 AT
Boxster S 3.4
Boxster S 3.4 AT
2.5 TFSI (340 Hp)
TT RS DCT
TT RS MT
TT RS plus DCT
TT RS plus MT
1.8T 163
1.8T 163 CVT
1.8T 163 quattro
1.8T 170 CVT
2.0
2.4
2.4 CVT
2.5 TDI
2.5 TDI CVT
3.0
3.0 CVT
3.0 quattro
3.0 quattro AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
130 L / 4.6 cu-ft
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft
246 L / 8.7 cu-ft ~ 315 L / 11.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.8 L / 8.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
2
2
4
Payload
320 kg / 705 lbs
480 kg / 1058 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/40 R18
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1348 mm / 53.1 in
1391 mm / 54.8 in
Size | Length
4329 mm / 170.4 in
4198 mm / 165.3 in
4573 mm / 180.0 in
Size | Width
1801 mm / 70.9 in | 1978 mm / 77.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1842 mm / 72.5 in | 1952 mm / 76.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1486.0 mm / 58.5 in
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
1523.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1528.0 mm / 60.2 in
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
1523.0 mm / 60.0 in
Wheel Size
9J x 18
7J x 16
Wheelbase
2415 mm / 95.1 in
2468 mm / 97.2 in
2654 mm / 104.5 in
Performance
Braking | 200 km/h - 0
134.3 m / 440.5 ft
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Mid-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 5
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.3 cu-in / 2480.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
78.0 mm / 3.1 in
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol flat-6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-5 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Reviews
Neofiliac score
81%
74%
55%
Pros
- Great H6 engines
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Improved styling with the soft top up
- Decent performance
- Interesting 2.5 TFSI engine
- Decent reliability
- Decent engine reliability
- Multi-link suspensions all around
Cons
- MacPherson suspensions all around
- Poor ZF automatic transmission
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Horrible CVT
- Horrendous ZF 5HP automatic transmission
- Awkward proportions
- Mediocre build quality
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.