Compare Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder vs Lamborghini Murcielago Roadster vs Audi R8 4S Spyder facelift

Variants
Gallardo Spyder
Gallardo Spyder AT
Murcielago LP 640 Roadster
Murcielago Roadster
RWD
quattro
Performance RWD
Performance quattro

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
110 L / 3.9 cu-ft
112 L / 4.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
21.0 L / 22.2 qt
15.0 L / 15.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.0 L / 7.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
100.0 L / 26.4 gal
Passengers
2
2
2
Payload
175 kg / 386 lbs
310 kg / 683 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
12.6 m / 41.2 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1184 mm / 46.6 in
1242 mm / 48.9 in
Size | Length
4429 mm / 174.4 in
Size | Width
1900 mm / 74.8 in
1940 mm / 76.4 in | 2037 mm / 80.2 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1635.0 mm / 64.4 in
1645.0 mm / 64.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1695.0 mm / 66.7 in
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
Weight
1690.0 kg / 3725.8 lbs
Wheel Size
8.5J x 19, 11J x 19
Front wheel rims: 8.5 J x 18 Rear wheel rims: 13 J x 18
8.5J x 19, 11J x 19
Wheelbase
2560 mm / 100.8 in
2665 mm / 104.9 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
495 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.36
Top Speed
330.0 km/h / 205.1 mph

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.7:1
Engine | Displacement
5.2 L / 317.6 cu-in / 5204.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
7-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Automatic S tronic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
85%
86%
89%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Characterful V10
  • Superb performance
  • Great V12 sound
  • Newly available in RWD
  • Sweet N/A V10
  • Overall good looks
  • High levels of comfort
Cons
  • High 0.36 drag coefficient
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • Too ostentatious
  • Quite uncomfortable
  • Reliability issues
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • Very little cargo space
  • Very little cargo space
  • Why not buy the Lambo for not much more?

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.