Compare Lamborghini Murcielago Roadster vs Audi TT RS 8J Roadster vs Audi TT FV/8S Roadster facelift

Variants
Murcielago LP 640 Roadster
Murcielago Roadster
2.5 TFSI (340 Hp)
TT RS DCT
TT RS MT
TT RS plus DCT
TT RS plus MT
40 TFSI DCT
45 TFSI MT
45 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
15.0 L / 15.9 qt
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
100.0 L / 26.4 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
2
2
2
Payload
310 kg / 683 lbs
320 kg / 705 lbs
280 kg / 617 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/40 R18
225/50 R17
Turning Circle
12.6 m / 41.2 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1348 mm / 53.1 in
1355 mm / 53.3 in
Size | Length
4198 mm / 165.3 in
4191 mm / 165.0 in
Size | Width
1842 mm / 72.5 in | 1952 mm / 76.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1832 mm / 72.1 in | 1966 mm / 77.4 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1635.0 mm / 64.4 in
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1695.0 mm / 66.7 in
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Weight
1690.0 kg / 3725.8 lbs
Wheel Size
Front wheel rims: 8.5 J x 18 Rear wheel rims: 13 J x 18
9J x 18
8J x 17
Wheelbase
2665 mm / 104.9 in
2468 mm / 97.2 in
2505 mm / 98.6 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
495 g/km
Top Speed
330.0 km/h / 205.1 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 5
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.3 cu-in / 2480.0 cc
2.0 L / 121.1 cu-in / 1984.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-5 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
86%
74%
40%
Pros
  • Superb performance
  • Great V12 sound
  • Decent performance
  • Interesting 2.5 TFSI engine
  • Decent reliability
  • Decent engine robustness
Cons
  • Quite uncomfortable
  • Reliability issues
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • Very little cargo space
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Somewhat ugly
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Not as cheap as it looks

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.