Compare Ferrari California T (F149M)
Ferrari California T (F149M) | |
---|---|
Reviews | |
Neofiliac score | 87% |
Pros |
|
Cons |
|
Price | |
Offers (incl. referral links) | |
Remove |
[[{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Cargo Capacity","Fv":"241 L / 8.5 cu-ft ~ 340 L / 12.0 cu-ft"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Coolant Capacity","Fv":"21.0 L / 22.2 qt"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Engine Oil Capacity","Fv":"13.0 L / 13.7 qt"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Fuel Capacity","Fv":"78.0 L / 20.6 gal"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Passengers","Fv":"4"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Front","Fv":"Ventilated discs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Rear","Fv":"Ventilated discs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Power Steering","Fv":"Electric Steering"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Front","Fv":"Double-wishbone"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Rear","Fv":"Multi-link"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Tire Size","Fv":"245/40 ZR19, 285/40 ZR19, 245/35 ZR20, 285/35 ZR20"},{"Ft":"Construction","Fn":"Body Style","Fv":"2-door Convertible"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Height","Fv":"1322 mm / 52.0 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Length","Fv":"4570 mm / 179.9 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Width","Fv":"1910 mm / 75.2 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Front","Fv":"1631.0 mm / 64.2 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Rear","Fv":"1605.0 mm / 63.2 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Weight","Fv":"1625.0 kg / 3582.5 lbs"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheel Size","Fv":"19 in, 20 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheelbase","Fv":"2670 mm / 105.1 in"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h","Fv":"3.6 sec"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph","Fv":"3.4 sec"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"CO2 Emission","Fv":"250 g/km"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Fuel Economy","Fv":"10.5 L/100km / 22.4 MPG (combined)"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Top Speed","Fv":"315.0 km/h / 195.7 mph"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Drivetrain Layout","Fv":"Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine","Fv":"F154BB"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Bore","Fv":"86.5 mm / 3.4 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Compression Ratio","Fv":"9.4:1"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Displacement","Fv":"3.9 L / 235.2 cu-in / 3855.0 cc"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Power","Fv":"560.0 hp / 417.6 kW @ 7500 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Specific Output","Fv":"145.3 hp/L / 2.4 hp/cu-in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Stroke","Fv":"82.0 mm / 3.2 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Torque","Fv":"755 Nm / 556.9 lb-ft @ 4750 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Type","Fv":"Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V8 engine with 4 values per cylinder"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Gears","Fv":"7-speed"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Type","Fv":"Automatic dual clutch"},{"Ft":"Production","Fn":"Availability","Fv":"2014 ~ 2017"}]]
Related Products
BMW M6 F12 2012
- More power and torque than before
- Better electronics
- Manual transmission available
· 86%
Alpina B6 F12 2012
- Superb level of torque
- Good performance
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspensions
· 84%
- Exceptional styling with top up or down
- Enjoyable 7500rpm redline
- Wonderful engine characteristics despite turbocharging
· 98%
BMW 6 Series F12 2011
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Improved styling
- Great performance
· 77%
BMW 6 Series F12 LCI 2015
- Slightly improved engine reliability through updates
- Good ZF 8HP transmission
- Good looks
· 80%
BMW M8 F91 2019
- Rather good performance
- Powerful V8 (perhaps the last from BMW)
- Decent handling
· 87%
BMW 8 Series G14 2019
- Rather good styling
- Luxurious interior
- Decent performanceGood 0.28 drag coefficient
· 85%
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.