Compare Chevrolet Corvette C7 Convertible vs Chevrolet Camaro 6 Convertible vs Opel Astra H TwinTop

Variants
Grand Sport
Grand Sport AT
Stingray
Stingray AT
Z06
Z06 AT
ZR1
ZR1 AT
2.0 AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
3.6
3.6 AT
6.2
6.2 AT
ZL1
ZL1 AT
1.6 105
1.6 115
1.6T
1.8 125
1.8 140
1.8 140 AT
1.9 CDTI
2.0T 170
2.0T 200

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
206 L / 7.3 cu-ft
205 L / 7.2 cu-ft ~ 440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Payload
470 kg / 1036 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
122 mm / 4.8 in
Size | Height
1411 mm / 55.6 in
Size | Length
4476 mm / 176.2 in
Size | Width
1759 mm / 69.3 in | 2021 mm / 79.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1831 mm / 72.1 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1481.0 mm / 58.3 in
Wheelbase
2811 mm / 110.7 in
2614 mm / 102.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.37
0.31

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 6 b
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in

Production

Availability
2006 ~ 2010

Reviews

Neofiliac score
96%
80%
29%
Pros
  • Superb performance
  • Much improved handling
  • Great chassis and suspension
  • High drivetrain reliability
  • Unique 7-speed manual transmission
  • Decent performance
  • Affordable way to get a big V8
  • Sounds great
  • Cheap hardtop convertible
  • True top-down driving experience
  • Decent styling
Cons
  • The Targa may be more interesting
  • Build quality concerns
  • High 0.37 drag coefficient
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Slow and sluggish
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Not very comfortable

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.