Compare Chevrolet Corvette C6 Convertible vs Chevrolet Camaro 6 Convertible vs Volvo C70 II

Variants
Z06
Z06 AT
2.0 AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
3.6
3.6 AT
6.2
6.2 AT
ZL1
ZL1 AT
2.0D
2.0D AT
D3
D3 AT
D4
D4 AT
2.4D
D5
D5 AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4i
2.4i AT
T5 230 AT
T5 220
T5 220 AT
T5 230

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
144 L / 5.1 cu-ft ~ 295 L / 10.4 cu-ft
206 L / 7.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.9 L / 12.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
2
4
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/40 R19

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1246 mm / 49.1 in
Size | Length
4435 mm / 174.6 in
Size | Width
1844 mm / 72.6 in
Track Width | Front
1577.0 mm / 62.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
Weight
1490.0 kg / 3284.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2686 mm / 105.7 in
2811 mm / 110.7 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
4.0 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.37
Fuel Economy
12.4 L/100km / 19.0 MPG (urban) | 8.4 L/100km / 28.0 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
290.0 km/h / 180.2 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 b
Euro 5
Engine
LS2
Engine | Bore
101.6 mm / 4.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.9:1
Engine | Displacement
6.0 L / 364.1 cu-in / 5967.0 cc
Engine | Power
405.0 hp / 302.0 kW @ 6000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
67.9 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
543 Nm / 400.5 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 engine with 2 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2004 ~ 2013

Reviews

Neofiliac score
87%
80%
29%
Pros
  • Superb engine lineup
  • Great drivetrain reliability
  • Good tunability
  • Solid chassis design
  • Great handling
  • Decent performance
  • Affordable way to get a big V8
  • Sounds great
  • Good drivetrain reliability
  • Cheap on the used market
Cons
  • Build quality concerns
  • High 0.37 drag coefficient
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Quite ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Diesel in a convertible
  • Complicated top mechanism

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.