HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Chevrolet Camaro 5 Convertible vs Chevrolet Camaro 6 Convertible vs Volvo C70 Convertible

Variants
L99 AT
LS3
2.0 AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
3.6
3.6 AT
6.2
6.2 AT
ZL1
ZL1 AT
2.0T 180
2.0T 225
2.0T 225 AT
2.0T 163
T5 239
T5 245
2.4T 200
2.5
2.5 AT
2.5T

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
206 L / 7.3 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
5.8 L / 6.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
4
4
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1378 mm / 54.3 in
Size | Length
4837 mm / 190.4 in
Size | Width
1917 mm / 75.5 in
Track Width | Front
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheelbase
2852 mm / 112.3 in
2811 mm / 110.7 in
2660 mm / 104.7 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.37
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 6 b
Engine | Bore
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
76%
80%
28%
Pros
  • Athletic design
  • Wide range of powerful yet efficient engine choices
  • Improved drivetrain reliability
  • Decent performance
  • Affordable way to get a big V8
  • Sounds great
  • Characterful I5 engines
  • No diesel nonsense
  • Reliable drivetrain
Cons
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Low side and rear visibility
  • Build quality concerns
  • High 0.37 drag coefficient
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Ugly with the top up and down
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.