Compare Chevrolet Camaro 5 Convertible vs Saab 9-3 Convertible vs Opel Astra H TwinTop
Variants
L99 AT
LS3
2.0T 185
2.0T 205
2.3i 150 AT
2.3T 230
2.3i 150
1.6 105
1.6 115
1.6T
1.8 125
1.8 140
1.8 140 AT
1.9 CDTI
2.0T 170
2.0T 200
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
295 L / 10.4 cu-ft ~ 378 L / 13.3 cu-ft
205 L / 7.2 cu-ft ~ 440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.5 L / 9.0 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Payload
470 kg / 1036 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
122 mm / 4.8 in
Size | Height
1378 mm / 54.3 in
1411 mm / 55.6 in
Size | Length
4837 mm / 190.4 in
4629 mm / 182.2 in
4476 mm / 176.2 in
Size | Width
1917 mm / 75.5 in
1711 mm / 67.4 in
1759 mm / 69.3 in | 2021 mm / 79.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1831 mm / 72.1 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1442.0 mm / 56.8 in
1481.0 mm / 58.3 in
Wheelbase
2852 mm / 112.3 in
2605 mm / 102.6 in
2614 mm / 102.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
90.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
76%
53%
29%
Pros
- Athletic design
- Wide range of powerful yet efficient engine choices
- Improved drivetrain reliability
- Overall good styling
- Decent reliability
- Easy and cheap to fix
- Cheap hardtop convertible
- True top-down driving experience
- Decent styling
Cons
- Low cargo capacity
- Low side and rear visibility
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Slow and sluggish
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- Not very comfortable
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.