Compare Chevrolet Camaro 4 Convertible vs Chevrolet Camaro 5 Convertible vs Opel Astra H TwinTop
Variants
3.4
3.4 AT
3.8 193
3.8 203
3.8 203 AT
5.7 279
5.7 279 AT
5.7 344 AT
Z28
Z28 AT
L99 AT
LS3
1.6 105
1.6 115
1.6T
1.8 125
1.8 140
1.8 140 AT
1.9 CDTI
2.0T 170
2.0T 200
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
215 L / 7.6 cu-ft
205 L / 7.2 cu-ft ~ 440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Payload
470 kg / 1036 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
122 mm / 4.8 in
Size | Height
1378 mm / 54.3 in
1411 mm / 55.6 in
Size | Length
4837 mm / 190.4 in
4476 mm / 176.2 in
Size | Width
1917 mm / 75.5 in
1759 mm / 69.3 in | 2021 mm / 79.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1831 mm / 72.1 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1481.0 mm / 58.3 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2852 mm / 112.3 in
2614 mm / 102.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
72%
76%
29%
Pros
- Good engine reliability
- Decent build quality
- Easy to work on
- Athletic design
- Wide range of powerful yet efficient engine choices
- Improved drivetrain reliability
- Cheap hardtop convertible
- True top-down driving experience
- Decent styling
Cons
- Dated styling
- Low cargo capacity
- Low side and rear visibility
- Slow and sluggish
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- Not very comfortable
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.