HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Ford Mustang 6 Convertible vs Ford Focus CC vs Chrysler 200 Convertible

Variants
2.3 EcoBoost 309
2.3 EcoBoost 309 AT
2.3 EcoBoost 317
2.3 EcoBoost 317 AT
3.7 304
3.7 304 AT
GT 421
GT 421 AT
GT 426
GT 426 AT
1.6 Duratec
2.0 Duratec AT
2.0 TDCi
2.4
3.6

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
332 L / 11.7 cu-ft
238 L / 8.4 cu-ft ~ 534 L / 18.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
4
4
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55R16

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1394 mm / 54.9 in
1456 mm / 57.3 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4509 mm / 177.5 in
4947 mm / 194.8 in
Size | Width
1834 mm / 72.2 in
1843 mm / 72.6 in
Track Width | Front
1582.0 mm / 62.3 in
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1594.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheelbase
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2765 mm / 108.9 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
11.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
11.3 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
0.34
Fuel Economy
8.3 L/100km / 28.3 MPG (combined) | 11.8 L/100km / 19.9 MPG (urban) | 6.3 L/100km / 37.3 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
198.0 km/h / 123.0 mph
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/o brakes)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.8:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 122.0 cu-in / 1999.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
72.5 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.1 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
190 Nm / 140.1 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
4-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic

Production

Availability
2015 ~ 2017
2006 ~ 2010
2011 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
78%
25%
45%
Pros
  • Improved styling
  • Better build quality
  • Fully independent suspensions
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • Hardtop convertible
  • Better styled than the Sebring
  • Decent drivetrain
  • Good comfort
Cons
  • Tiny inline-4 engine
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Awkward styling
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad handling
  • Quite front-heavy

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.