Compare Ford Mustang 4 Convertible vs Saab 9-3 Convertible vs Ford Focus CC
Variants
3.8 147
3.8 190
3.8 GT 152
4.6 Cobra R
4.6 Cobra
4.6 GT 215
4.6 GT 228
4.6 GT 263
5.0 GT
2.0T 185
2.0T 205
2.3i 150 AT
2.3T 230
2.3i 150
1.6 Duratec
2.0 Duratec AT
2.0 TDCi
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
295 L / 10.4 cu-ft ~ 378 L / 13.3 cu-ft
238 L / 8.4 cu-ft ~ 534 L / 18.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.5 L / 9.0 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55R16
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1456 mm / 57.3 in
Size | Length
4629 mm / 182.2 in
4509 mm / 177.5 in
Size | Width
1711 mm / 67.4 in
1834 mm / 72.2 in
Track Width | Front
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1442.0 mm / 56.8 in
Wheelbase
2605 mm / 102.6 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
11.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
11.3 sec
Fuel Economy
8.3 L/100km / 28.3 MPG (combined) | 11.8 L/100km / 19.9 MPG (urban) | 6.3 L/100km / 37.3 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
198.0 km/h / 123.0 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
90.0 mm / 3.5 in
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.8:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 122.0 cu-in / 1999.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
72.5 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.1 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
190 Nm / 140.1 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
69%
53%
25%
Pros
- Good reliability record
- Overall good styling
- Decent reliability
- Easy and cheap to fix
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Hardtop convertible
Cons
- Basic suspension setup
- Low cargo capacity
- Down on power
- Inefficient
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- Awkward styling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.