Compare Ford Thunderbird 11 vs Alfa Romeo Spider 916 vs Ford Focus CC
Variants
2001
2002+
1.8 T. Spark
2.0 JTS
2.0 T. Spark 150 Euro3
2.0 T. Spark 150
2.0 T. Spark 155
2.0 V6 TB
3.0 V6 192
3.0 V6 218
3.2 V6 240
1.6 Duratec
2.0 Duratec AT
2.0 TDCi
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
238 L / 8.4 cu-ft ~ 534 L / 18.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
2
2
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55R16
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1323 mm / 52.1 in
1456 mm / 57.3 in
Size | Length
4509 mm / 177.5 in
Size | Width
1829 mm / 72.0 in
1834 mm / 72.2 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
Wheelbase
2723 mm / 107.2 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
11.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
11.3 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Fuel Economy
8.3 L/100km / 28.3 MPG (combined) | 11.8 L/100km / 19.9 MPG (urban) | 6.3 L/100km / 37.3 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
198.0 km/h / 123.0 mph
Towing Capacity
1000 kg / 2205 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.8:1
Engine | Displacement
4.0 L / 241.0 cu-in / 3950.0 cc
2.0 L / 122.0 cu-in / 1999.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
72.5 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
85.0 mm / 3.3 in
83.1 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
190 Nm / 140.1 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Manual
Automatic
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
66%
23%
25%
Pros
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Good suspension setup
- Decent engine offerings
- Decent driving dynamics
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Hardtop convertible
Cons
- Somewhat strange looking
- Does not handle well
- Quite ugly
- No powerful engine options
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very little cargo space
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- Awkward styling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.