HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Ford Focus CC vs Ford Mustang 6 Convertible vs Volvo C70 Convertible

Variants
1.6 Duratec
2.0 Duratec AT
2.0 TDCi
2.3 EcoBoost 309
2.3 EcoBoost 309 AT
2.3 EcoBoost 317
2.3 EcoBoost 317 AT
3.7 304
3.7 304 AT
GT 421
GT 421 AT
GT 426
GT 426 AT
2.0T 180
2.0T 225
2.0T 225 AT
2.0T 163
T5 239
T5 245
2.4T 200
2.5
2.5 AT
2.5T

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
238 L / 8.4 cu-ft ~ 534 L / 18.9 cu-ft
332 L / 11.7 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.8 L / 6.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
4
4
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
205/55R16

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1456 mm / 57.3 in
1394 mm / 54.9 in
Size | Length
4509 mm / 177.5 in
Size | Width
1834 mm / 72.2 in
Track Width | Front
1582.0 mm / 62.3 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheelbase
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2660 mm / 104.7 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
11.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
11.3 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Fuel Economy
8.3 L/100km / 28.3 MPG (combined) | 11.8 L/100km / 19.9 MPG (urban) | 6.3 L/100km / 37.3 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
198.0 km/h / 123.0 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.8:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 122.0 cu-in / 1999.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
72.5 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.1 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
190 Nm / 140.1 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2006 ~ 2010
2015 ~ 2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
25%
78%
28%
Pros
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • Hardtop convertible
  • Improved styling
  • Better build quality
  • Fully independent suspensions
  • Characterful I5 engines
  • No diesel nonsense
  • Reliable drivetrain
Cons
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Awkward styling
  • Tiny inline-4 engine
  • Ugly with the top up and down
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.