HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Chrysler PT Cruiser Convertible vs Peugeot 206 CC vs Chrysler PT Cruiser Convertible

Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4
2.4 Turbo
2.4 Turbo AT
1.6 HDI
1.6i
1.6i AT
2.0 S16
2.0 S16 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4
2.4 Turbo
2.4 Turbo AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft
175 L / 6.2 cu-ft
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Payload
400 kg / 882 lbs
400 kg / 882 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
195/65 R15
195/65 R15

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1600 mm / 63.0 in
1600 mm / 63.0 in
Size | Length
4290 mm / 168.9 in
3835 mm / 151.0 in
4290 mm / 168.9 in
Size | Width
1705 mm / 67.1 in
1673 mm / 65.9 in
1705 mm / 67.1 in
Track Width | Front
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Weight
1500.0 kg / 3306.9 lbs
1500.0 kg / 3306.9 lbs
Wheel Size
6J x 15
6J x 15
Wheelbase
2615 mm / 103.0 in
2442 mm / 96.1 in
2615 mm / 103.0 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
235 g/km
235 g/km

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.8 cu-in / 1996.0 cc
2.0 L / 121.8 cu-in / 1996.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
68.1 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
68.1 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
188 Nm / 138.7 lb-ft @ 4150 rpm
188 Nm / 138.7 lb-ft @ 4150 rpm

Reviews

Neofiliac score
23%
11%
23%
Pros
  • OK-looking with the top down
  • Hardtop convertible
  • Decent reliability
  • OK-looking with the top down
Cons
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Ugly with the top up
  • No powerful engine options
  • Poor chassis and suspension
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very little cargo space
  • Poor interior
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Ugly with the top up
  • No powerful engine options
  • Poor chassis and suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.