Compare Chrysler PT Cruiser Convertible vs Renault Wind vs Chrysler PT Cruiser Convertible

Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4
2.4 Turbo
2.4 Turbo AT
1.2 TCe
1.6 VVT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4
2.4 Turbo
2.4 Turbo AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
Passengers
4
2
4
Payload
400 kg / 882 lbs
400 kg / 882 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
195/65 R15
195/45 R16, 205/40 R17
195/65 R15
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1600 mm / 63.0 in
1381 mm / 54.4 in
1600 mm / 63.0 in
Size | Length
4290 mm / 168.9 in
3833 mm / 150.9 in
4290 mm / 168.9 in
Size | Width
1705 mm / 67.1 in
1689 mm / 66.5 in | 1913 mm / 75.3 in (mirror unfolded)
1705 mm / 67.1 in
Track Width | Front
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
1451.0 mm / 57.1 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
1430.0 mm / 56.3 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Weight
1500.0 kg / 3306.9 lbs
1500.0 kg / 3306.9 lbs
Wheel Size
6J x 15
7J x 16, 7J x 17
6J x 15
Wheelbase
2615 mm / 103.0 in
2368 mm / 93.2 in
2615 mm / 103.0 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
235 g/km
235 g/km

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.8 cu-in / 1996.0 cc
2.0 L / 121.8 cu-in / 1996.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
68.1 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
68.1 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
188 Nm / 138.7 lb-ft @ 4150 rpm
188 Nm / 138.7 lb-ft @ 4150 rpm
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2010 ~ 2013

Reviews

Neofiliac score
23%
4%
23%
Pros
  • OK-looking with the top down
  • Hardtop convertible
  • No diesel nonsense
  • OK-looking with the top down
Cons
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Ugly with the top up
  • No powerful engine options
  • Poor chassis and suspension
  • Extremely slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Very tight inside
  • Extremely ugly
  • Very uncomfortable
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Ugly with the top up
  • No powerful engine options
  • Poor chassis and suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.