Compare Chrysler 200 Convertible vs Opel Tigra TwinTop vs Chrysler PT Cruiser Convertible
Variants
2.4
3.6
1.3 CDTI
1.4
1.4 AT
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4
2.4 Turbo
2.4 Turbo AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft ~ 440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
Passengers
4
2
4
Payload
400 kg / 882 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
185/60 R15
195/65 R15
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
1364 mm / 53.7 in
1600 mm / 63.0 in
Size | Length
4947 mm / 194.8 in
3921 mm / 154.4 in
4290 mm / 168.9 in
Size | Width
1843 mm / 72.6 in
1685 mm / 66.3 in
1705 mm / 67.1 in
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
1429.0 mm / 56.3 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1594.0 mm / 62.8 in
1420.0 mm / 55.9 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Weight
1500.0 kg / 3306.9 lbs
Wheel Size
6J x 15
Wheelbase
2765 mm / 108.9 in
2491 mm / 98.1 in
2615 mm / 103.0 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
122 g/km
235 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/o brakes)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.8 cu-in / 1996.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
68.1 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
188 Nm / 138.7 lb-ft @ 4150 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2011 ~ 2014
Reviews
Neofiliac score
45%
11%
23%
Pros
- Better styled than the Sebring
- Decent drivetrain
- Good comfort
- Cheap hardtop convertible
- OK-looking with the top down
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad handling
- Quite front-heavy
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- Diesel nonsense
- Horrible suspension setup
- Unreliable
- Rough-running
- Slow and sluggish
- Ugly with the top up
- No powerful engine options
- Poor chassis and suspension
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.