HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Chrysler Sebring 2 Convertible vs Fiat 500C vs Chrysler PT Cruiser Convertible

Variants
2.0
2.4
2.7
0.9 TWIN AIR
1.2
1.3 MultiJet
1.4
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4
2.4 Turbo
2.4 Turbo AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
320 L / 11.3 cu-ft
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Payload
415 kg / 915 lbs
400 kg / 882 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
195/65 R15

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
3-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1488 mm / 58.6 in
1600 mm / 63.0 in
Size | Length
4920 mm / 193.7 in
3546 mm / 139.6 in
4290 mm / 168.9 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1627 mm / 64.1 in
1705 mm / 67.1 in
Track Width | Front
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1408.0 mm / 55.4 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Weight
970.0 kg / 2138.5 lbs
1500.0 kg / 3306.9 lbs
Wheel Size
15 in, 16 in
6J x 15
Wheelbase
2690 mm / 105.9 in
2300 mm / 90.6 in
2615 mm / 103.0 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
235 g/km

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
ECC
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.8 cu-in / 1996.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
68.1 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
188 Nm / 138.7 lb-ft @ 4150 rpm
Transmission | Type
Manual

Reviews

Neofiliac score
39%
17%
23%
Pros
  • True convertible
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent styling
  • OK-looking with the top down
Cons
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Poor interior quality
  • No real convertible experience
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Ugly with the top up
  • No powerful engine options
  • Poor chassis and suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.