Compare Chrysler Prowler vs Chrysler Sebring 2 Convertible vs Volvo C70 Convertible
Variants
2.0
2.4
2.7
2.0T 180
2.0T 225
2.0T 225 AT
2.0T 163
T5 239
T5 245
2.4T 200
2.5
2.5 AT
2.5T
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
50 L / 1.8 cu-ft
320 L / 11.3 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.8 L / 6.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Helical spring
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
225/45 R17, 295/40 R20
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1295 mm / 51.0 in
Size | Length
4200 mm / 165.4 in
4920 mm / 193.7 in
Size | Width
1945 mm / 76.6 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1615.0 mm / 63.6 in
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Weight
1290.0 kg / 2844.0 lbs
Wheelbase
2880 mm / 113.4 in
2690 mm / 105.9 in
2660 mm / 104.7 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
6.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.5 sec
Fuel Economy
13.8 L/100km / 17.0 MPG (urban) | 10.2 L/100km / 23.1 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
ECC
Engine | Bore
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.9:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 214.7 cu-in / 3518.0 cc
Engine | Power
257.0 hp / 191.6 kW @ 6400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
73.1 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
346 Nm / 255.2 lb-ft @ 3950 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
1997 ~ 2002
Reviews
Neofiliac score
80%
39%
28%
Pros
- Unique retro styling
- Well balanced
- Good handling
- True convertible
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Characterful I5 engines
- No diesel nonsense
- Reliable drivetrain
Cons
- Very little cargo space
- Not a real performance machine
- Slow and sluggish
- Low cargo capacity
- Poor interior quality
- Ugly with the top up and down
- Low cargo capacity
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.