Compare Peugeot 207 CC vs Chrysler PT Cruiser Convertible vs Chrysler 200 Convertible
Variants
1.6 HDi 109
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 156
1.6 VTi
1.6 VTi Euro5
1.6 VTi Euro5 AT
1.6 VTi AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4
2.4 Turbo
2.4 Turbo AT
2.4
3.6
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.1 L / 7.5 qt
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Payload
400 kg / 882 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion
Multi-link
Tire Size
195/65 R15
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1600 mm / 63.0 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4290 mm / 168.9 in
4947 mm / 194.8 in
Size | Width
1748 mm / 68.8 in | 1972 mm / 77.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1818 mm / 71.6 in (mirror folded)
1705 mm / 67.1 in
1843 mm / 72.6 in
Track Width | Front
1469.0 mm / 57.8 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
1594.0 mm / 62.8 in
Weight
1500.0 kg / 3306.9 lbs
Wheel Size
6J x 15
Wheelbase
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2615 mm / 103.0 in
2765 mm / 108.9 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
235 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
0.34
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/o brakes)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.8 cu-in / 1996.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
68.1 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
188 Nm / 138.7 lb-ft @ 4150 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2011 ~ 2014
Reviews
Neofiliac score
16%
23%
45%
Pros
- Hardtop convertible
- Improved exterior styling
- OK-looking with the top down
- Better styled than the Sebring
- Decent drivetrain
- Good comfort
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- Slow and sluggish
- Ugly with the top up
- No powerful engine options
- Poor chassis and suspension
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad handling
- Quite front-heavy
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.