Compare Peugeot 207 CC vs Citroen C3 Pluriel vs Chrysler PT Cruiser Convertible
Variants
1.6 HDi 109
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 156
1.6 VTi
1.6 VTi Euro5
1.6 VTi Euro5 AT
1.6 VTi AT
1.1
1.4 HDi
1.4 HDi Euro4
1.4i
1.4i Euro4
1.6i AT
1.6i Euro4 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4
2.4 Turbo
2.4 Turbo AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
267 L / 9.4 cu-ft
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.1 L / 7.5 qt
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Payload
400 kg / 882 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
195/65 R15
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1600 mm / 63.0 in
Size | Length
3934 mm / 154.9 in
4290 mm / 168.9 in
Size | Width
1748 mm / 68.8 in | 1972 mm / 77.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1818 mm / 71.6 in (mirror folded)
1700 mm / 66.9 in | 1877 mm / 73.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1705 mm / 67.1 in
Track Width | Front
1469.0 mm / 57.8 in
1435.0 mm / 56.5 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
1431.0 mm / 56.3 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Weight
1500.0 kg / 3306.9 lbs
Wheel Size
6J x 15
Wheelbase
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2460 mm / 96.9 in
2615 mm / 103.0 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
235 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
0.32
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.8 cu-in / 1996.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
68.1 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
188 Nm / 138.7 lb-ft @ 4150 rpm
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
16%
25%
23%
Pros
- Hardtop convertible
- Improved exterior styling
- Innovative top configuration
- Easy to fix
- OK-looking with the top down
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small, rough-running engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Very ugly indeed
- Slow and sluggish
- Ugly with the top up
- No powerful engine options
- Poor chassis and suspension
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.