Compare Nissan Micra C+C vs Mazda MX-5 NC1 vs Nissan 370Z Roadster
Variants
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0 AT
2.0 6MT
MT
AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
255 L / 9.0 cu-ft ~ 457 L / 16.1 cu-ft
150 L / 5.3 cu-ft
140 L / 4.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.3 L / 5.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.9 L / 5.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
4
2
2
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1441 mm / 56.7 in
1245 mm / 49.0 in
1325 mm / 52.2 in
Size | Length
3808 mm / 149.9 in
3995 mm / 157.3 in
4250 mm / 167.3 in
Size | Width
1668 mm / 65.7 in
1720 mm / 67.7 in
1845 mm / 72.6 in
Track Width | Front
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
1490.0 mm / 58.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1448.0 mm / 57.0 in
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
Wheelbase
2432 mm / 95.7 in
2330 mm / 91.7 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in
Performance
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
VQ37VHR
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.8:1
11.0:1
Engine | Displacement
3.7 L / 225.5 cu-in / 3696.0 cc
Engine | Power
328.0 hp / 244.6 kW @ 7000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
88.7 hp/L / 1.5 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.1 mm / 3.3 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
363 Nm / 267.7 lb-ft @ 5200 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2005 ~ 2009
2005 ~ 2008
2009 ~ 2019
Reviews
Neofiliac score
10%
86%
82%
Pros
- Decent reliability
- No diesel nonsense
- Optional glass roof
- Superb handling characteristics
- High reliability
- New hard top
- Sweet manual transmissions
- Improved performance
- Improved drivetrain
- Improved styling
- Great handling
- Great suspension setup
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- No independent rear suspensions
- Only available with small engines
- Very little cargo space
- Very little cargo space
- Poor interior quality
- Very tight inside
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.