Compare Nissan 350Z Roadster vs Nissan Micra C+C vs Fiat 500C

Variants
283
300 AT
300
313
313 AT
1.4
1.6
0.9 TWIN AIR
1.2
1.3 MultiJet
1.4

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
255 L / 9.0 cu-ft ~ 457 L / 16.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.9 L / 8.3 qt
5.3 L / 5.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Payload
195 kg / 430 lbs
415 kg / 915 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
3-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1441 mm / 56.7 in
1488 mm / 58.6 in
Size | Length
3808 mm / 149.9 in
3546 mm / 139.6 in
Size | Width
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1668 mm / 65.7 in
1627 mm / 64.1 in
Track Width | Front
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1448.0 mm / 57.0 in
1408.0 mm / 55.4 in
Weight
970.0 kg / 2138.5 lbs
Wheel Size
15 in, 16 in
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2432 mm / 95.7 in
2300 mm / 90.6 in

Performance

Fuel Economy
11.4 L/100km / 20.6 MPG (combined) | 17.0 L/100km / 13.8 MPG (urban) | 9.2 L/100km / 25.6 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Manual

Production

Availability
2005 ~ 2009

Reviews

Neofiliac score
79%
10%
17%
Pros
  • Good handling characteristics
  • Sweet and reliable engine
  • Good manual transmission
  • Double-wishbone suspensions all around
  • Decent reliability
  • No diesel nonsense
  • Optional glass roof
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent styling
Cons
  • Poor interior quality
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No real convertible experience
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.