Compare Nissan 350Z Roadster vs Opel Tigra TwinTop vs Nissan Micra C+C
Variants
283
300 AT
300
313
313 AT
1.3 CDTI
1.4
1.4 AT
1.8
1.4
1.6
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft ~ 440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
255 L / 9.0 cu-ft ~ 457 L / 16.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.9 L / 8.3 qt
5.3 L / 5.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
Passengers
2
2
4
Payload
195 kg / 430 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Tire Size
185/60 R15
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1364 mm / 53.7 in
1441 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
3921 mm / 154.4 in
3808 mm / 149.9 in
Size | Width
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1685 mm / 66.3 in
1668 mm / 65.7 in
Track Width | Front
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1429.0 mm / 56.3 in
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1420.0 mm / 55.9 in
1448.0 mm / 57.0 in
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2491 mm / 98.1 in
2432 mm / 95.7 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
122 g/km
Fuel Economy
11.4 L/100km / 20.6 MPG (combined) | 17.0 L/100km / 13.8 MPG (urban) | 9.2 L/100km / 25.6 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2005 ~ 2009
Reviews
Neofiliac score
79%
11%
10%
Pros
- Good handling characteristics
- Sweet and reliable engine
- Good manual transmission
- Double-wishbone suspensions all around
- Cheap hardtop convertible
- Decent reliability
- No diesel nonsense
- Optional glass roof
Cons
- Poor interior quality
- Low cargo capacity
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- Diesel nonsense
- Horrible suspension setup
- Unreliable
- Rough-running
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.