HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Wind vs Citroen C3 Pluriel vs Citroen DS3 Cabrio

Variants
1.2 TCe
1.6 VVT
1.1
1.4 HDi
1.4 HDi Euro4
1.4i
1.4i Euro4
1.6i AT
1.6i Euro4 AT
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 82
1.6 BlueHDi 100
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 e-HDi 90
1.6 e-HDi 90 ETG
1.6 THP 155
1.6 THP 165
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
267 L / 9.4 cu-ft
245 L / 8.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
3.8 L / 4.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
2
4
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Tire Size
195/45 R16, 205/40 R17
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
3-door Convertible

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1381 mm / 54.4 in
1458 mm / 57.4 in
Size | Length
3833 mm / 150.9 in
3934 mm / 154.9 in
3948 mm / 155.4 in
Size | Width
1689 mm / 66.5 in | 1913 mm / 75.3 in (mirror unfolded)
1700 mm / 66.9 in | 1877 mm / 73.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1715 mm / 67.5 in
Track Width | Front
1451.0 mm / 57.1 in
1435.0 mm / 56.5 in
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1430.0 mm / 56.3 in
1431.0 mm / 56.3 in
1467.0 mm / 57.8 in
Wheel Size
7J x 16, 7J x 17
Wheelbase
2368 mm / 93.2 in
2460 mm / 96.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2010 ~ 2013

Reviews

Neofiliac score
4%
25%
12%
Pros
  • Hardtop convertible
  • No diesel nonsense
  • Innovative top configuration
  • Easy to fix
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Reasonable reliability
Cons
  • Extremely slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Very tight inside
  • Extremely ugly
  • Very uncomfortable
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small, rough-running engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very ugly indeed
  • Rough engines for a convertible
  • Hatchback-based
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.