Compare Renault Megane 3 CC vs Renault Wind vs Nissan Micra C+C
Variants
1.2 TCe 130
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.6 110
1.6 dCi 130
1.9 dCi 130
2.0 140 CVT
GT 2.0 dCi 160
GT 2.0 TCe 180
1.2 TCe
1.6 VVT
1.4
1.6
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
211 L / 7.5 cu-ft ~ 417 L / 14.7 cu-ft
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
255 L / 9.0 cu-ft ~ 457 L / 16.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
5.3 L / 5.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
Passengers
4
2
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent
Tire Size
195/45 R16, 205/40 R17
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.9 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1434 mm / 56.5 in
1381 mm / 54.4 in
1441 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
4485 mm / 176.6 in
3833 mm / 150.9 in
3808 mm / 149.9 in
Size | Width
1811 mm / 71.3 in | 2072 mm / 81.6 in (mirror unfolded)
1689 mm / 66.5 in | 1913 mm / 75.3 in (mirror unfolded)
1668 mm / 65.7 in
Track Width | Front
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
1451.0 mm / 57.1 in
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1430.0 mm / 56.3 in
1448.0 mm / 57.0 in
Wheel Size
7J x 16, 7J x 17
Wheelbase
2609 mm / 102.7 in
2368 mm / 93.2 in
2432 mm / 95.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.310
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
5-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Manual
Production
Availability
2010 ~ 2013
2005 ~ 2009
Reviews
Neofiliac score
22%
4%
10%
Pros
- Improved engine lineup
- Decent reliability
- Hardtop convertible
- No diesel nonsense
- Decent reliability
- No diesel nonsense
- Optional glass roof
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- Quite ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Diesel in convertible
- No independent rear suspensions
- Extremely slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
- Very tight inside
- Extremely ugly
- Very uncomfortable
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.