Compare Opel Astra H TwinTop vs Opel Tigra TwinTop vs Nissan Micra C+C
Variants
1.6 105
1.6 115
1.6T
1.8 125
1.8 140
1.8 140 AT
1.9 CDTI
2.0T 170
2.0T 200
1.3 CDTI
1.4
1.4 AT
1.8
1.4
1.6
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
205 L / 7.2 cu-ft ~ 440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft ~ 440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
255 L / 9.0 cu-ft ~ 457 L / 16.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.3 L / 5.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
Passengers
4
2
4
Payload
470 kg / 1036 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Tire Size
185/60 R15
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
122 mm / 4.8 in
Size | Height
1411 mm / 55.6 in
1364 mm / 53.7 in
1441 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
4476 mm / 176.2 in
3921 mm / 154.4 in
3808 mm / 149.9 in
Size | Width
1759 mm / 69.3 in | 2021 mm / 79.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1831 mm / 72.1 in (mirror folded)
1685 mm / 66.3 in
1668 mm / 65.7 in
Track Width | Front
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
1429.0 mm / 56.3 in
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1481.0 mm / 58.3 in
1420.0 mm / 55.9 in
1448.0 mm / 57.0 in
Wheelbase
2614 mm / 102.9 in
2491 mm / 98.1 in
2432 mm / 95.7 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
122 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2010
2005 ~ 2009
Reviews
Neofiliac score
29%
11%
10%
Pros
- Cheap hardtop convertible
- True top-down driving experience
- Decent styling
- Cheap hardtop convertible
- Decent reliability
- No diesel nonsense
- Optional glass roof
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- Not very comfortable
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- Diesel nonsense
- Horrible suspension setup
- Unreliable
- Rough-running
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.