Compare Opel Astra H TwinTop vs Opel Speedster vs Lotus Exige 3 Roadster
Variants
1.6 105
1.6 115
1.6T
1.8 125
1.8 140
1.8 140 AT
1.9 CDTI
2.0T 170
2.0T 200
2.0T
2.2
Sport 350
Sport 410
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
205 L / 7.2 cu-ft ~ 440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
206 L / 7.3 cu-ft
160 L / 5.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
36.0 L / 9.5 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
4
2
2
Payload
470 kg / 1036 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
175/55 R17, 225/45 R17
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
122 mm / 4.8 in
Size | Height
1411 mm / 55.6 in
1117 mm / 44.0 in
Size | Length
4476 mm / 176.2 in
3786 mm / 149.1 in
Size | Width
1759 mm / 69.3 in | 2021 mm / 79.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1831 mm / 72.1 in (mirror folded)
1710 mm / 67.3 in | 1884 mm / 74.2 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
1450.0 mm / 57.1 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1481.0 mm / 58.3 in
1468.0 mm / 57.8 in
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 17
17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2614 mm / 102.9 in
2330 mm / 91.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Mid-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
Z22SE (L61)
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 210.9 cu-in / 3456.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
120.4 hp/L / 2.0 hp/cu-in
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Manual
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
29%
80%
86%
Pros
- Cheap hardtop convertible
- True top-down driving experience
- Decent styling
- Superb handling
- Exceptionally light
- Decent speed
- Very good performance
- Supercharged variant
- New targa form factor
- Great handling
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- Not very comfortable
- No powerful engine options
- Low cargo capacity
- Very little cargo space
- Somewhat ugly
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.