Compare Opel Tigra TwinTop vs Chrysler Sebring 3 Convertible vs Chrysler PT Cruiser Convertible
Variants
1.3 CDTI
1.4
1.4 AT
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.7
2.7 AT
3.5
3.5 AT
Hard Top 2.0 CRD
Soft Top 2.0 CRD
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4
2.4 Turbo
2.4 Turbo AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft ~ 440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Payload
325 kg / 717 lbs
400 kg / 882 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
185/60 R15
215/60 R17, 215/55 R18
195/65 R15
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1364 mm / 53.7 in
1600 mm / 63.0 in
Size | Length
3921 mm / 154.4 in
4290 mm / 168.9 in
Size | Width
1685 mm / 66.3 in
1843 mm / 72.6 in
1705 mm / 67.1 in
Track Width | Front
1429.0 mm / 56.3 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1420.0 mm / 55.9 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Weight
1775.0 kg / 3913.2 lbs
1500.0 kg / 3306.9 lbs
Wheel Size
6, 5J x 17, 7, 0J x 18
6J x 15
Wheelbase
2491 mm / 98.1 in
2765 mm / 108.9 in
2615 mm / 103.0 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
122 g/km
235 g/km
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.8 cu-in / 1996.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
68.1 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
188 Nm / 138.7 lb-ft @ 4150 rpm
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Production
Availability
2007 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
11%
43%
23%
Pros
- Cheap hardtop convertible
- Available as both hard- and soft-top
- Decent petrol engines
- OK-looking with the top down
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- Diesel nonsense
- Horrible suspension setup
- Unreliable
- Rough-running
- Quite slow
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Somewhat awkward styling
- Slow and sluggish
- Ugly with the top up
- No powerful engine options
- Poor chassis and suspension
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.