Compare Alfa Romeo 4C Spider (960)
Alfa Romeo 4C Spider (960) | |
---|---|
Reviews | |
Neofiliac score | 76% |
Pros |
|
Cons |
|
Price | |
Offers (incl. referral links) | |
Remove |
[[{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Cargo Capacity","Fv":"110 L / 3.9 cu-ft"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Coolant Capacity","Fv":"10.6 L / 11.2 qt"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Engine Oil Capacity","Fv":"5.8 L / 6.1 qt"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Fuel Capacity","Fv":"40.0 L / 10.6 gal"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Passengers","Fv":"2"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Front","Fv":"Ventilated discs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Rear","Fv":"Ventilated discs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Front","Fv":"Double-wishbone"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Rear","Fv":"MacPherson"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Tire Size","Fv":"205/45 R17, 235/40 R18"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Turning Circle","Fv":"12.1 m / 39.7 ft"},{"Ft":"Construction","Fn":"Body Style","Fv":"2-door Convertible"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Ground Clearance","Fv":"113 mm / 4.4 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Height","Fv":"1183 mm / 46.6 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Length","Fv":"3989 mm / 157.0 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Width","Fv":"1864 mm / 73.4 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Front","Fv":"1639.0 mm / 64.5 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Rear","Fv":"1604.0 mm / 63.1 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Weight","Fv":"940.0 kg / 2072.3 lbs"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheel Size","Fv":"17 in, 18 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheelbase","Fv":"2380 mm / 93.7 in"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h","Fv":"4.5 sec"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph","Fv":"4.3 sec"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Braking | 100 km/h - 0","Fv":"36.0 m / 118.1 ft"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"CO2 Emission","Fv":"161 g/km"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Coefficient Of Drag","Fv":"0.341"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Fuel Economy","Fv":"6.9 L/100km / 34.1 MPG (combined) | 10.1 L/100km / 23.3 MPG (urban) | 5.1 L/100km / 46.1 MPG (highway)"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Top Speed","Fv":"257.0 km/h / 159.7 mph"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Drivetrain Layout","Fv":"Mid-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Emission Standard","Fv":"Euro 6"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Bore","Fv":"83.0 mm / 3.3 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Compression Ratio","Fv":"9.2:1"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Displacement","Fv":"1.7 L / 106.3 cu-in / 1742.0 cc"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Power","Fv":"240.0 hp / 179.0 kW @ 6000 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Specific Output","Fv":"137.8 hp/L / 2.3 hp/cu-in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Stroke","Fv":"80.5 mm / 3.2 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Torque","Fv":"350 Nm / 258.1 lb-ft @ 2200-4250 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Type","Fv":"Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Gears","Fv":"6-speed"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Type","Fv":"Automatic TCT"},{"Ft":"Production","Fn":"Availability","Fv":"2015 ~ 2020"}]]
Related Products
McLaren 650S Spider 2015
- Arguably more enjoyable than the 650S coupe
- Glorious 8500rpm redline
- Great handling
· 91%
BMW Z4 G29 2018
- Good handling characteristics
- Equipped with B58 engine
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
· 77%
Bentley Azure 1995
- Tremendous amount of torque
- Stately beautiful
- Luxury and exclusivity without the negatives associated with newer Bentleys
· 90%
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.