Compare Alfa Romeo Spider 939 vs Alfa Romeo Spider 916 vs Ford Focus CC
Variants
1.75 TBi
2.0 JTDM
2.2 JTS
2.2 JTS Selespeed
2.4 JTDM 200
2.4 JTDM 200 Q-Tronic
2.4 JTDM 210
3.2 JTS
3.2 V6 Q4
3.2 V6 Q4 AT
1.8 T. Spark
2.0 JTS
2.0 T. Spark 150 Euro3
2.0 T. Spark 150
2.0 T. Spark 155
2.0 V6 TB
3.0 V6 192
3.0 V6 218
3.2 V6 240
1.6 Duratec
2.0 Duratec AT
2.0 TDCi
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
253 L / 8.9 cu-ft
238 L / 8.4 cu-ft ~ 534 L / 18.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
2
4
Payload
350 kg / 772 lbs
Chassis
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55R16
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1318 mm / 51.9 in
1456 mm / 57.3 in
Size | Length
4393 mm / 173.0 in
4509 mm / 177.5 in
Size | Width
1834 mm / 72.2 in
Track Width | Front
1579.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheel Size
7.5 J x 17
Wheelbase
2528 mm / 99.5 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
11.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
11.3 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Fuel Economy
8.3 L/100km / 28.3 MPG (combined) | 11.8 L/100km / 19.9 MPG (urban) | 6.3 L/100km / 37.3 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
198.0 km/h / 123.0 mph
Towing Capacity
1000 kg / 2205 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.8:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 122.0 cu-in / 1999.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
72.5 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.1 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
190 Nm / 140.1 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Automatic
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
58%
23%
25%
Pros
- Improved handling and comfort
- Improved top-down styling
- Improved performance
- Decent engine offerings
- Decent driving dynamics
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Hardtop convertible
Cons
- Ugly with the top up
- Quite ugly
- No powerful engine options
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very little cargo space
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- Awkward styling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.