Compare Fiat 500C vs Chrysler PT Cruiser Convertible vs Chrysler 200 Convertible

Variants
0.9 TWIN AIR
1.2
1.3 MultiJet
1.4
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4
2.4 Turbo
2.4 Turbo AT
2.4
3.6

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Payload
415 kg / 915 lbs
400 kg / 882 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion
Multi-link
Tire Size
195/65 R15

Construction

Body Style
3-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1488 mm / 58.6 in
1600 mm / 63.0 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
3546 mm / 139.6 in
4290 mm / 168.9 in
4947 mm / 194.8 in
Size | Width
1627 mm / 64.1 in
1705 mm / 67.1 in
1843 mm / 72.6 in
Track Width | Front
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1408.0 mm / 55.4 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
1594.0 mm / 62.8 in
Weight
970.0 kg / 2138.5 lbs
1500.0 kg / 3306.9 lbs
Wheel Size
15 in, 16 in
6J x 15
Wheelbase
2300 mm / 90.6 in
2615 mm / 103.0 in
2765 mm / 108.9 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
235 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/o brakes)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.8 cu-in / 1996.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
68.1 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
188 Nm / 138.7 lb-ft @ 4150 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Automatic

Production

Availability
2011 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
23%
45%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent styling
  • OK-looking with the top down
  • Better styled than the Sebring
  • Decent drivetrain
  • Good comfort
Cons
  • No real convertible experience
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Ugly with the top up
  • No powerful engine options
  • Poor chassis and suspension
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad handling
  • Quite front-heavy

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.