Compare Mercedes-Benz CLC CL203 vs Mercedes-Benz A-Class W177 vs Ford Focus 2

Mercedes-Benz CLC CL203

Mercedes-Benz A-Class W177

Ford Focus 2

Mercedes-Benz CLC CL203Mercedes-Benz A-Class W177Ford Focus 2
Variants
CLC 160
CLC 160 AT
CLC 180 Kompressor
CLC 180 Kompressor AT
CLC 200 CDI
CLC 200 CDI AT
CLC 200 Kompressor
CLC 200 Kompressor AT
CLC 220 CDI
CLC 220 CDI AT
CLC 230
CLC 230 AT
CLC 250
CLC 250 AT
CLC 350
CLC 350 AT
A 160
A 180
A 180 d DCT
A 200
A 200 4MATIC DCT
A 200 d 4MATIC DCT
A 200 d DCT
A 200 DCT
A 220 4MATIC DCT
A 220 d 4MATIC DCT
A 220 d DCT
A 220 DCT
A 250 4MATIC DCT
A 250 DCT
A 250e
A 35 AMG
A 45 AMG
A 45 S AMG
1.4 80
1.6 100 AT
1.6 100
1.6 115
1.6D 90
1.6D 109
1.8 125
1.8D 116
2.0 145 AT
2.0 145
2.0D 136
RS
ST

Reviews

Neofiliac score31%48%45%
Pros
  • RWD remained
  • Slight interior improvements
  • Rather good design for a hatchback
  • Good performance in some models
  • Good 0.25 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent build quality
  • Clean, sporty design
  • Good engine options
  • Sweet manual transmission
  • Easy to work on
  • Fully independent suspensions
Cons
  • Arguably less appealing than its predecessor
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Cheaply put together
  • Only available with small engines
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Poor automatic transmission

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.