Compare Mercedes-Benz CL-Class C216 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class C205 facelift Coupe vs Mercedes-Benz CLK C209 facelift

Mercedes-Benz CL-Class C216 facelift

Mercedes-Benz C-Class C205 facelift Coupe

Mercedes-Benz CLK C209 facelift

Mercedes-Benz CL-Class C216 faceliftMercedes-Benz C-Class C205 facelift CoupeMercedes-Benz CLK C209 facelift
Variants
CL 63 AMG Performance
CL 63 AMG
CL 65 AMG
CL 500 4MATIC
CL 500
CL 600
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 180 MT
C 180
C 200 4MATIC
C 200
C 200d
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d
C 300e 4MATIC
C 300e
C 300d 4MATIC
C 300d
C 400 4MATIC
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163
CLK 200 Kompressor 184
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 AT
CLK 220 CDI
CLK 220 CDI AT
CLK 280
CLK 280 AT
CLK 320 CDI
CLK 320 CDI AT
CLK 350 AT
CLK 500 M113 AT
CLK 500 M273 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score94%70%79%
Pros
  • Superb M275-powered V12s
  • Imposing, unmistakable styling
  • Good drivetrain reliability
  • Interesting AMG V8 lived on for the last generation
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Overall good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Robust drivetrain
Cons
  • ABC problems
  • AWD nonsense
  • Mild-hybrid voodoo nonsense
  • Less durable engines
  • Rather ugly as a coupe (hunchback styling of fake coupe?)
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.