Compare Mercedes-Benz CL-Class C216 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class C204 Coupe vs Mercedes-Benz CLK C209 facelift

Mercedes-Benz CL-Class C216 facelift

Mercedes-Benz C-Class C204 Coupe

Mercedes-Benz CLK C209 facelift

Mercedes-Benz CL-Class C216 faceliftMercedes-Benz C-Class C204 CoupeMercedes-Benz CLK C209 facelift
Variants
CL 63 AMG Performance
CL 63 AMG
CL 65 AMG
CL 500 4MATIC
CL 500
CL 600
C 180
C 180 AT
C 180 BlueEFFICIENCY
C 180 BlueEFFICIENCY AT
C 200
C 200 AT
C 220 CDI
C 220 CDI AT
C 250 AT
C 250 CDI
C 250 CDI AT
C 350 AT
C 63 AMG
C 63 AMG Black Series
C 63 AMG Edition 507
C 63 AMG Performance
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163
CLK 200 Kompressor 184
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 AT
CLK 220 CDI
CLK 220 CDI AT
CLK 280
CLK 280 AT
CLK 320 CDI
CLK 320 CDI AT
CLK 350 AT
CLK 500 M113 AT
CLK 500 M273 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score94%75%79%
Pros
  • Superb M275-powered V12s
  • Imposing, unmistakable styling
  • Good drivetrain reliability
  • Several versions of the NA C63 AMG
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Rather robust drivetrain
  • Overall good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Robust drivetrain
Cons
  • ABC problems
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Lower grade of build than the CLK
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.