Compare Mercedes CLA C117 facelift vs Nissan Maxima A34 vs Nissan Bluebird Sylphy G10
Variants
CLA 45 AMG
CLA 180
CLA 180 DCT
CLA 180d
CLA 180d DCT
CLA 200
CLA 200 DCT
CLA 200d
CLA 200d 4MATIC DCT
CLA 200d DCT
CLA 220 4MATIC DCT
CLA 220d 4MATIC DCT
CLA 220d DCT
CLA 250
CLA 250 4MATIC DCT
CLA 250 DCT
3.5
3.5 AT
1.5 105hp
1.5 105hp AT
1.5 109hp
1.5 109hp AT
1.6 110hp
1.6 110hp AT
1.6 118hp
1.6 118hp AT
1.8 115hp AWD AT
1.8 117hp AWD AT
1.8 120hp AT
2.0 145hp CVT
2.0 150hp CVT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
470 L / 16.6 cu-ft
390 L / 13.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
452 kg / 996 lbs
275 kg / 606 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Spring Strut
Tire Size
225/55 R17
Construction
Body Style
4-door Coupe
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1432 mm / 56.4 in
Size | Length
4640 mm / 182.7 in
Size | Width
1777 mm / 70.0 in | 2032 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Weight
1610.0 kg / 3549.4 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in
Wheelbase
2699 mm / 106.3 in
2535 mm / 99.8 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Fuel Economy
11.8 L/100km / 19.9 MPG (urban) | 8.4 L/100km / 28.0 MPG (highway)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
Engine | Power
268.0 hp / 199.8 kW @ 6000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
76.6 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
345 Nm / 254.5 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Production
Availability
2016 ~ 2018
2004 ~ 2008
Reviews
Neofiliac score
22%
6%
26%
Pros
- Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
- Improved exterior styling
- Rather spacious inside
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Small engines
- Ugly hunchback styling
- Build quality concerns
- FWD platform
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad suspension options
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.