Compare BMW M6 F13 Coupe vs BMW 4 Series F32 LCI Coupe vs BMW 3 Series E92 LCI Coupe

Variants
M6
M6 Competition
420d
420d AT
420d xDrive
420d xDrive AT
420i
420i AT
420i xDrive
420i xDrive AT
430d AT
430d xDrive AT
430i
430i AT
430i xDrive AT
435d xDrive AT
440i
440i AT
440i xDrive
440i xDrive AT
318i
320d
320d AT
320d xDrive
320d xDrive AT
320i
320i AT
325d
325d AT
325i
325i AT
325i xDrive
325i xDrive AT
330d
330d AT
330d xDrive
330d xDrive AT
330i
330i AT
330i xDrive
330i xDrive AT
335d AT
335i
335i AT
335i xDrive
335i xDrive AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft
445 L / 15.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
18.5 L / 19.5 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
8.5 L / 9.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Payload
520 kg / 1146 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/50 R17, 225/45 R18, 255/40 R18, 225/40 R19, 255/35 R19
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Length
4898 mm / 192.8 in
4640 mm / 182.7 in
4612 mm / 181.6 in
Size | Width
1899 mm / 74.8 in
1825 mm / 71.9 in
1782 mm / 70.2 in
Track Width | Front
1631.0 mm / 64.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1612.0 mm / 63.5 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8.5J x 18, 8J x 19, 8.5J x 19
Wheelbase
2851 mm / 112.2 in
2810 mm / 110.6 in
2760 mm / 108.7 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
231 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 6
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
4.4 L / 268.2 cu-in / 4395.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
88.3 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
Transmission | Type
Double clutch transmission (DCT)

Production

Availability
2017 ~ 2020
2010 ~ 2013

Reviews

Neofiliac score
84%
76%
56%
Pros
  • Quick and faster
  • Lots of power
  • Elegant yet imposing styling
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension
  • Improve petrol engine reliability
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good interior quality
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Good exterior styling
  • Overall good handling
Cons
  • Very unreliable engine
  • Over-styled exterior
  • MacPherson front suspension
  • Does not handle as well as the marketing material suggests
  • MacPherson front suspension
  • Poor engine reliability across the lineup (except N52)
  • Poor interior quality

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.