Compare Audi S5 F5 vs Audi TTS FV vs Audi S5 F5

Variants
3.0 TDI
3.0 TFSI
292PS 6DCT
306PS 7DCT
310PS 6MT
310PS 6DCT
3.0 TDI
3.0 TFSI

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
58.0 L / 15.3 gal
58.0 L / 15.3 gal
Passengers
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Height
1368 mm / 53.9 in
1343 mm / 52.9 in
1368 mm / 53.9 in
Size | Width
1846 mm / 72.7 in | 2029 mm / 79.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1846 mm / 72.7 in | 2029 mm / 79.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
1574.0 mm / 62.0 in
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1568.0 mm / 61.7 in
1553.0 mm / 61.1 in
1568.0 mm / 61.7 in
Wheelbase
2765 mm / 108.9 in
2505 mm / 98.6 in
2765 mm / 108.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
0.29
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1900 kg / 4189 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1900 kg / 4189 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 6
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.3:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.1 cu-in / 1984.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
60%
61%
60%
Pros
  • Lots of power
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • More balanced than Mk1
  • Decent styling
  • Lots of power
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • More balanced than Mk1
Cons
  • Ugly, over-styled body
  • Questionable drivetrain reliability
  • Too much tech nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Uninspiring overall
  • Ugly, over-styled body
  • Questionable drivetrain reliability
  • Too much tech nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.