Compare Aston Martin Vantage vs Aston Martin Vanquish vs Bentley Continental GT
Variants
V8 Vantage
V8 Vantage 2009
V8 Vantage AT 2009
V12 Vantage
V8 Vantage N430
V8 Vantage N430 AT
V8 Vantage S
V8 Vantage S AT
V12 Vantage S AT
Vanquish
Vanquish S
Continental GT
Continental GT Speed
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
370 L / 13.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
14.8 L / 15.6 qt
19.0 L / 20.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
10.5 L / 11.1 qt
12.5 L / 13.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
90.0 L / 23.8 gal
Passengers
2
4
Payload
415 kg / 915 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.8 m / 42.0 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1318 mm / 51.9 in
Size | Length
4665 mm / 183.7 in
Size | Width
1923 mm / 75.7 in
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2690 mm / 105.9 in
2745 mm / 108.1 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
AJ37
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
9.5:1
Engine | Displacement
5.9 L / 362.2 cu-in / 5935.0 cc
6.0 L / 366.0 cu-in / 5998.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
79.5 mm / 3.1 in
90.2 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged multi-port injected petrol W12 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
96%
86%
76%
Pros
- Compact size and V12 in the V12 Vantage
- Superb athletic yet elegant styling
- Manual transmission
- Improved build quality
- Superb exterior styling
- Good interior finish
- Characterful V12 engine
- Superb power and torque
- Good interiors
- Lots of customizable options
Cons
- Low cargo capacity
- Confusing model name
- Troublesome automated manual transmission
- Extremely unreliable
- Very high fuel consumption
- Design did not age well
- Bad handling dynamics
- AWD nonsense
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.